Cisco WLCs Get New WPA2 and WPA3 Options

Welcome to our November 2019 Blog update where this month I want to focus on changes to the Cisco security settings for WLANs and the new WPA2 and WPA3 options.

Cisco has changed its configuration options on both its AirOS and IOS-XE based controller platforms to include WPA3.

Now, when you select the security options on the latest AirOS controllers (currently 8.10) or IOS-XE controllers (currently 16.12), you get to choose from WPA+WPA2 or WPA2+WPA3. See Figures 1 and 2.

Figure 1: New WPA2 and WPA3 Options – Cisco AirOS Security – Layer 2 Security Setup

Figure 2: Cisco IOS-XE Security – Layer 2 Security Setup

Note: you also get the choice of WPA2 Personal or WPA2 Enterprise, on the AirOS controllers. See Figure 3.

Figure 3: Cisco AirOS Security – Layer 2 Security Type Setup

These options fit more closely with recommendations and vendor design guides. The option to choose Personal or Enterprise is simply selected from a drop-down.

Finally, you can also select WPA3 and configure options such as OWE and SAE.

(Blog article follow-up planned for December on this).

*Note* Amended as of 11/30/19: my intention was to write on WPA3 SAE and OWE (well, Enhanced Open anyway). However, my good friend mrncciew has written a most excellent series of articles on WPA3 and Enhanced Open. So I’ll redirect you to his links instead:
https://mrncciew.com/2019/11/21/enhanced-open-part-1/
https://mrncciew.com/2019/11/29/wpa3-sae-mode/
https://mrncciew.com/2019/11/29/wpa3-sae-transition-mode/

See you next time!

 

About NC-Expert

NC-Expert is a privately-held California corporation and is well established within the Wireless, Security, and Collaboration industry certification training, courseware development, and consulting markets.
Led by its Founder and CEO, Rie Vainstein, NC-Expert has won numerous private contracts with Fortune level companies around the world. These customers have depended on NC-Expert to train, advise, and mentor their staff.

So remember, if you are looking for the best IT training just call us at (855) 941-2121 or contact us

NC-Expert Blog

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #4: If Coverage is Good, Capacity Will Be Fine

By Rie Morgan • July 8, 2026
Walk into almost any office after a new Wi-Fi deployment and you'll hear a familiar sentence: "Coverage looks great. We should be good." It sounds logical. After all, if every corner of the building has a healthy signal, surely the network can handle whatever users throw at it. Except... that's not how Wi-Fi works. Coverage and capacity are close friends, but they're definitely not twins. One answers the question, "Can devices hear the network?" The other answers, "Can everyone actually use it at the same time?" Confusing the two is one of the most common mistakes in Wi-Fi design, and it often explains why a network that looks fantastic on a heatmap still leaves users frustrated.  Let's bust this myth once and for all.

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #3: Strong Signal Means Great Wi-Fi

By Rie Morgan • July 1, 2026
We've all seen it happen: A user reports that "the Wi-Fi is terrible," so someone immediately checks the signal strength. "RSSI is -48 dBm." "Excellent." "Problem solved." Except... the user is still staring at a spinning "loading" icon. Welcome to one of the most persistent myths in wireless networking: Strong signal means great Wi-Fi. It's an easy trap to fall into because signal strength is visible. Nearly every wireless tool reports RSSI. Devices proudly display three, four, or five little bars. Coverage heatmaps glow with reassuring shades of green. Yet experienced Wi-Fi engineers know that great signal strength and great Wi-Fi are not the same thing. In fact, it’s entirely possible to have outstanding RSSI while users experience dreadful performance!

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #2: Higher Transmit Power Means Better Wi-Fi

By Rie Morgan • June 23, 2026
If there were a "Wi-Fi Myths Hall of Fame," this one would have its own wing! At some point in almost every Wi-Fi engineer's career, someone suggests turning up the transmit power to solve a coverage or performance problem. The logic seems sound: if a louder signal reaches farther, surely users will enjoy better Wi-Fi? Unfortunately, Wi-Fi doesn't work quite that way. The myth that higher transmit power automatically means better Wi-Fi has survived for decades because it feels intuitive. More power sounds stronger. Stronger sounds better. Yet in real-world Wi-Fi environments, increasing transmit power often creates new problems while solving very few. Let's explore why...