Other IoT (Besides BLE)

I wanted to let you know that there are other IoT protocols out there besides BLE. We hear a lot about BLE, and last time, I wrote a lot about the operation of BLE.

This time I want to write about other alternatives. This isn’t going to be a comprehensive list but, hopefully, will give you a flavor of what is out there.

Where to start? Well let’s start with Wi-FI. Wi-Fi operates in 2.4GHz and 5GHz (and soon 6GHz, but we’ll ignore that for now). Most people don’t automatically register Wi-Fi with IoT but there are IoT devices out there that use Wi-Fi.

Most IoT protocols run on top of 802.15.4 or a variant of it. These protocols are ideal for IoT systems.

IoT protocols that use 2.4GHz include Bluetooth/BLE, Zigbee and WirelessHART. These operate in the same frequency space as 2.4GHz Wi-Fi.

We also have CBRS (private LTE) operating around 3.6 MHz.

Most of the rest of the more common protocols* operate Sub-1GHz. Usually operating around 800-900+MHz (country dependent in many cases). This is where you will find Z-Wave, LoRa, Thread, and HaLow.

Let’s have a high-level overview of WirelessHART, LoRa, Thread and HaLow.

WirelessHART operates in the 2.4GHz ISM band and is designed to be low-power and have long battery life. Used in industrial and especially refinery industries. Here is a link to a great overview of WirelessHART by my colleague and friend, Troy Martin: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FkoY5NF0fVY

LoRa stands for Long Range. It is designed to allow communication between 2 points (P2P) over long distances. LoRaWAN is based on LoRa and is the protocol for building a network.

Thread is a mesh-based system based on 802.15.4. It runs on IP(v6) and is designed to create device-to-device, or device-to-cloud communications. Thread builds on top of 6LowPAN, which is IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area networks.

HaLow was created by the Wi-Fi Alliance and is sometimes called Wi-Fi for IoT. It is based on 802.11ah and thus runs below 1GHz (S1G). It has low-power and long-range, penetrating walls and building due to its operation below 1GHz. It is designed to be very power efficient, running for years on coin cell-type batteries. Like other Sub-1GHz protocols the exact frequencies that HaLow runs on is region dependent.

Well there you go. Now you know more about IoT and some of the various protocols that exist to support it.

See you next time!

===

About NC-Expert

NC-Expert is a privately-held California corporation and is well established within the Wireless, Security, and Collaboration industry certification training, courseware development, and consulting markets.

Led by its Founder and CEO, Rie Vainstein, NC-Expert has won numerous private contracts with Fortune level companies around the world. These customers have depended on NC-Expert to train, advise, and mentor their staff.

So remember, if you are looking for the best IT training just call us at (855) 941-2121 or contact us

The post Other IoT (Besides BLE) appeared first on NC Expert.

NC-Expert Blog

By Rie Morgan July 30, 2026
Every new Wi-Fi generation arrives with a wave of excitement: faster speeds; lower latency; more efficient use of the spectrum; and better handling of dense environments. Wi-Fi 7 is no exception. It brings some genuinely impressive technological advances but, unfortunately, it also brings a familiar myth: "If we upgrade to Wi-Fi 7, all of our wireless problems will disappear." If only wireless engineering were that simple. Wi-Fi 7 is an outstanding technology, but it isn't a magic wand. Poor design, interference, bad client behavior, and unrealistic expectations don't suddenly vanish because the APs have a shiny new logo on the box. Let's bust another myth...
By Rie Morgan July 23, 2026
Few phrases trigger a knowing smile from experienced Wi-Fi engineers quite like this one, "It's the client's fault." Someone's video call drops while walking through the office or a warehouse scanner pauses between aisles, voice handsets crackle as users move from one floor to another... then, almost immediately, someone points at the device and confidently declares, "Well... clients decide when to roam." Technically, they're correct. But, practically, that's only part of the story. Roaming is one of the most fascinating aspects of Wi-Fi because it isn't controlled by a single device or a single setting. It's a partnership between the client, the infrastructure, and the RF environment. When that partnership breaks down, blaming one side rarely tells the whole story. Let's bust another myth... Yes, Clients Make the Decision Let's start with the important truth: in almost every Wi-Fi deployment, the client device ultimately decides when to leave one AP and join another. Laptops, smartphones, tablets, barcode scanners, medical devices, and countless IoT products all use their own roaming algorithms. Some roam aggressively whereas some cling to their current AP for far too long. Others seem convinced that losing the connection entirely is preferable to switching. Every Wi-Fi engineer has encountered at least one stubborn client that appears almost “emotionally attached” to a particular AP. :) Client behavior matters, but that's not where the story ends.
By Rie Morgan July 17, 2026
Every Wi-Fi engineer has heard some version of it, "Can't we just install the access points where the old ones were?" Or perhaps, "The floorplan looks straightforward. Let's save some time and skip the survey." Occasionally, someone even says the dangerous words, "We've done hundreds of these buildings. They're all basically the same." That's usually the point where experienced wireless engineers quietly smile, knowing that the building is about to teach everyone a valuable lesson because: buildings don't read design guides, concrete doesn't care about your deployment schedule, metal doesn't respect your project budget, and radio waves have never once agreed to cooperate, simply because everyone wanted them to. Let's talk about why a site survey isn't an optional luxury... it's one of the most valuable engineering tools available. Every Building Is Different At first glance, two office buildings may appear identical: same square footage, same number of floors, similar room layouts, yet their wireless behavior can be dramatically different: one may have reinforced concrete walls, another may contain extensive glass partitions, the warehouse may be filled with moving inventory, a hospital may have elevators, imaging equipment, and countless reflective surfaces, a manufacturing facility may contain machinery that wasn't mentioned on any floorplan, and remember: even furniture changes RF behavior! Anyone who has performed enough surveys eventually develops a healthy respect for one simple fact: the building always gets a vote, too!