Bluetooth and Bluetooth Low Energy

Welcome to our April 2020 blog update where this month I want to focus on Bluetooth (BT) and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE).

You may see a lot of talk about BLE. I thought I’d write a little blog on the differences between Bluetooth (BT) and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE).

A lot of people think they are the same and related. Well they kinda are, but distant cousins – not brothers. They have a common heritage, but they have several important distinctions.

BT was created in the mid to late 1990s, from work done at Ericsson in the years previous. It was created to run over short distances and be used for things like mice and keyboards. It was designed to replace small cable runs, over short distances.

Today, in addition to mice and keyboards, you most probably have experienced in your headphones, your microphone (probably for your phone, embedded into an earpiece), or maybe even in your car.

BT breaks down into two main types of devices: BT Classic (also known as BR/EDR) and BLE.

BLE was introduced in BT v4.0 (2010) and lives up to its name – low energy/power. Both these types cannot interoperate, even though they are both technically BT, and operate in the same 2.4GHz (2.400 – 2.4835GHz) frequency. A device wishing to operate both protocols needs to run both protocols (this is sometimes called a Dual Mode device).

You may see BLE sometimes referred to as BT Smart. BLE is becoming more popular, especially because of its lower power use, and therefore longer battery life. BT was designed, and intended, for continuous data streaming, where BLE was designed for short burst data transmission. BT is used for audio streaming, and file transfers. BLE tends to be used for data transmission, and/or control with low-bandwidth applications.

Technical Details (BT v5.0 – 2016)

<<Click image to enlarge>>

BLE versions are backwards-compatible.

There you go! Lots of information on BLE, so now you can impress people at parties, right? Or maybe…?

See you next time!

===

*Speed is the speed of the PHY layer, application throughput tends to be around 70% of the stated “speed”.

**2Mbps speed involved use of new hardware. It is possible older equipment may not support this.

*** BT5.0

===

About NC-Expert

NC-Expert is a privately-held California corporation and is well established within the Wireless, Security, and Collaboration industry certification training, courseware development, and consulting markets.

Led by its Founder and CEO, Rie Vainstein, NC-Expert has won numerous private contracts with Fortune level companies around the world. These customers have depended on NC-Expert to train, advise, and mentor their staff.

So remember, if you are looking for the best IT training just call us at (855) 941-2121 or contact us

The post Bluetooth and Bluetooth Low Energy appeared first on NC Expert.

NC-Expert Blog

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #9: More Bandwidth Always Means Better Performance

By Rie Morgan • August 6, 2026
If there's one thing network users love, it's bandwidth. Need faster Wi-Fi? More bandwidth. Application running slowly? More bandwidth. Video buffering? More bandwidth. Someone sneezed near the wireless network? Probably needs more bandwidth. :) As Wi-Fi engineers, we've all heard it. Somewhere along the way, bandwidth became synonymous with performance. But while bandwidth certainly matters, it's only one ingredient in a much larger recipe. In many deployments, increasing available bandwidth produces little improvement and, in some cases, it can actually make things worse! Like many Wi-Fi myths, this one contains just enough truth to be convincing. Let's bust it...

Wi-Fi Myth Series - Myth #8: Wi-Fi 7 Will Fix My Wireless Problems

By Rie Morgan • July 30, 2026
Every new Wi-Fi generation arrives with a wave of excitement: faster speeds; lower latency; more efficient use of the spectrum; and better handling of dense environments. Wi-Fi 7 is no exception. It brings some genuinely impressive technological advances but, unfortunately, it also brings a familiar myth: "If we upgrade to Wi-Fi 7, all of our wireless problems will disappear." If only wireless engineering were that simple. Wi-Fi 7 is an outstanding technology, but it isn't a magic wand. Poor design, interference, bad client behavior, and unrealistic expectations don't suddenly vanish because the APs have a shiny new logo on the box. Let's bust another myth...

Wi-Fi Myth Series - Myth #7: Roaming Problems are Always Client Problems

By Rie Morgan • July 23, 2026
Few phrases trigger a knowing smile from experienced Wi-Fi engineers quite like this one, "It's the client's fault." Someone's video call drops while walking through the office or a warehouse scanner pauses between aisles, voice handsets crackle as users move from one floor to another... then, almost immediately, someone points at the device and confidently declares, "Well... clients decide when to roam." Technically, they're correct. But, practically, that's only part of the story. Roaming is one of the most fascinating aspects of Wi-Fi because it isn't controlled by a single device or a single setting. It's a partnership between the client, the infrastructure, and the RF environment. When that partnership breaks down, blaming one side rarely tells the whole story. Let's bust another myth... Yes, Clients Make the Decision Let's start with the important truth: in almost every Wi-Fi deployment, the client device ultimately decides when to leave one AP and join another. Laptops, smartphones, tablets, barcode scanners, medical devices, and countless IoT products all use their own roaming algorithms. Some roam aggressively whereas some cling to their current AP for far too long. Others seem convinced that losing the connection entirely is preferable to switching. Every Wi-Fi engineer has encountered at least one stubborn client that appears almost “emotionally attached” to a particular AP. :) Client behavior matters, but that's not where the story ends.