Bluetooth and Bluetooth Low Energy

Welcome to our April 2020 blog update where this month I want to focus on Bluetooth (BT) and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE).

You may see a lot of talk about BLE. I thought I’d write a little blog on the differences between Bluetooth (BT) and Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE).

A lot of people think they are the same and related. Well they kinda are, but distant cousins – not brothers. They have a common heritage, but they have several important distinctions.

BT was created in the mid to late 1990s, from work done at Ericsson in the years previous. It was created to run over short distances and be used for things like mice and keyboards. It was designed to replace small cable runs, over short distances.

Today, in addition to mice and keyboards, you most probably have experienced in your headphones, your microphone (probably for your phone, embedded into an earpiece), or maybe even in your car.

BT breaks down into two main types of devices: BT Classic (also known as BR/EDR) and BLE.

BLE was introduced in BT v4.0 (2010) and lives up to its name – low energy/power. Both these types cannot interoperate, even though they are both technically BT, and operate in the same 2.4GHz (2.400 – 2.4835GHz) frequency. A device wishing to operate both protocols needs to run both protocols (this is sometimes called a Dual Mode device).

You may see BLE sometimes referred to as BT Smart. BLE is becoming more popular, especially because of its lower power use, and therefore longer battery life. BT was designed, and intended, for continuous data streaming, where BLE was designed for short burst data transmission. BT is used for audio streaming, and file transfers. BLE tends to be used for data transmission, and/or control with low-bandwidth applications.

Technical Details (BT v5.0 – 2016)

<<Click image to enlarge>>

BLE versions are backwards-compatible.

There you go! Lots of information on BLE, so now you can impress people at parties, right? Or maybe…?

See you next time!

===

*Speed is the speed of the PHY layer, application throughput tends to be around 70% of the stated “speed”.

**2Mbps speed involved use of new hardware. It is possible older equipment may not support this.

*** BT5.0

===

About NC-Expert

NC-Expert is a privately-held California corporation and is well established within the Wireless, Security, and Collaboration industry certification training, courseware development, and consulting markets.

Led by its Founder and CEO, Rie Vainstein, NC-Expert has won numerous private contracts with Fortune level companies around the world. These customers have depended on NC-Expert to train, advise, and mentor their staff.

So remember, if you are looking for the best IT training just call us at (855) 941-2121 or contact us

The post Bluetooth and Bluetooth Low Energy appeared first on NC Expert.

NC-Expert Blog

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #2: Higher Transmit Power Means Better Wi-Fi

By Rie Morgan • June 23, 2026
If there were a "Wi-Fi Myths Hall of Fame," this one would have its own wing! At some point in almost every Wi-Fi engineer's career, someone suggests turning up the transmit power to solve a coverage or performance problem. The logic seems sound: if a louder signal reaches farther, surely users will enjoy better Wi-Fi? Unfortunately, Wi-Fi doesn't work quite that way. The myth that higher transmit power automatically means better Wi-Fi has survived for decades because it feels intuitive. More power sounds stronger. Stronger sounds better. Yet in real-world Wi-Fi environments, increasing transmit power often creates new problems while solving very few. Let's explore why...

Wi-Fi Myth Series – Myth #1: More Access Points Always Improve Performance

By Rie Morgan • June 18, 2026
If you've spent any time in wireless networking, you've probably heard a variation of this statement: "The Wi-Fi is slow. Let's add another AP." It's one of the most common assumptions in enterprise wireless networking. It sounds logical: more APs should mean more Wi-Fi, and more Wi-Fi should mean better performance. Right? Not always. In fact, there are many situations where adding more APs can actually make a network perform worse. For certified Wi-Fi engineers, this isn't a surprising revelation. Yet the myth continues to appear in meetings, project discussions, and troubleshooting sessions across countless organizations. Let's explore why...

Vendor-Neutral Certifications Matter More Than People Think

By Rie Morgan • June 1, 2026
We all know that technology changes fast : vendors update products, rebrand solutions, release new platforms, and occasionally decide that the feature you spent months mastering is no longer "fashionable". In an industry that constantly evolves, it’s fair to ask an important question: Should you focus on vendor-specific certifications, or do vendor-neutral certifications still have a place? The answer might surprise some people. Despite the growing number of vendor-specific training paths, vendor-neutral certifications such as CompTIA Network+, CompTIA Security+, and CWNP Certified Wireless Network Administrator (CWNA) continue to provide enormous value. In many cases, they offer benefits that extend well beyond a single product, platform, or employer. For engineers pursuing a promotion, changing careers, or trying to build a stronger professional foundation, vendor-neutral certifications may matter more today than ever before.